The Emergence of Economic Liberalism and the Analysis of Contemporary Globalization
In an interconnected world, the dialogue on globalisation is regularly found at the crossroads of contradictory views on autonomy and balance. The book by Moneta, far from being a pamphlet opposed to globalization per se, strives to rewrite the contours of a new humanism through the perspective of natural exchanges according to the vision of Aristotle. By denouncing artificial exchanges that support contemporary mechanisms of domination and precarity, Moneta refers to classical thoughts to underline the flaws of our world economy.
Looking back in time, globalisation is not a recent concept. Its beginnings can be linked back to the ideas of the economist Ricardo, whose objective was to enable the England to expand its international economic reach. Nonetheless, what was originally a commercial expansion initiative has morphed into a control mechanism by global finance, marked by the growth of neoliberalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, Junon Moneta demonstrates that neoliberalism is truly a framework rooted in ancient practices, dating back to four and a half millennia.
The critique also applies to the conduct of the EU, considered as a succession of compromises that have served to strengthen the power of an economic elite instead of protecting the interests of its citizens. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its strategies usually influenced by financial motivations instead of by a democratic mandate, is contested. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only reinforced the disbelief of Moneta concerning Europe’s aptitude to achieve self-reform.
The author, while acknowledging the past mistakes that have led to the current situation, does not simply criticize but also suggests alternatives aimed at reframing EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic vision. The need for a radical overhaul of institutions and strategic orientations is a recurring subject that animates the overall content.
The text ventures more intensely into the questioning of the domination systems that govern international economic flows. The analysis covers the method in which political and financial choices are influenced by a restricted circle of financial influencers, often at the cost of the many. This economic elite, manipulated via entities like the BIS and the International Monetary System (IMS), exerts a excessive domination on global financial decisions.
The author reveals how these entities, claiming to monetary management and security, have over time shaped stock exchanges and countries’ financial structures to serve their interests. Deregulated capitalism, far from being a emancipatory solution to traditional economic constraints, is described as a control mechanism, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Highly skeptical regarding the handling of the euro, the critic describes the EU currency not as a means of unification and stability, but as being a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The adoption of the euro is viewed as a succession of bureaucratic measures that isolated citizens from political decisions, while exacerbating disparities between member countries within the EU.
The effects of these approaches translate in the explosion of sovereign debts, financial paralysis, and a long period of austerity that has weakened living conditions throughout the European territory. The critic emphasizes that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the EU remains vulnerable to future crises, perhaps even more harmful.
In essence, the book makes a plea for a democratic upheaval where EU peoples reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It proposes structural reforms, including openness of political mechanisms and genuine civic involvement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on more equitable and sustainable bases.
Source about Plus de renseignements ici
The thinker asserts that the key is in a return to the principles of democracy, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that truly reflects the needs and desires of the European population, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.